All comparisons
Lever
Workable

Lever vs Workable: which ATS fits your team in 2026?

Lever and Workable target different parts of the market. Lever is a mid-market ATS plus recruiting CRM with collaborative workflows. Workable is an SMB-first all-in-one with public pricing starting at $299/month and lightweight HR features baked in. Here is how they compare on features, pricing, reviews, and where each one wins.

What Lever does

Lever is an applicant tracking system and recruiting CRM in one platform. It is built for mid-market teams that source proactively, not just receive inbound applicants.

Key capabilities:

  • Unified ATS and recruiting CRM
  • Custom hiring pipelines per role
  • Talent nurturing with email sequences
  • Candidate database search and rediscovery
  • Collaborative feedback and scorecards
  • Recruiting funnel and source analytics

G2 rating: 4.3/5 across 2,102 reviews.

What Workable does

Workable is an all-in-one recruiting and lightweight HR platform for SMBs and growing companies. The product publishes pricing starting at $299/month and includes onboarding and HRIS-style features alongside the core ATS.

Key capabilities:

  • Candidate sourcing suite with profile database
  • Applicant tracking system for hiring pipelines
  • Job board distribution to 200+ boards
  • AI screening assistant and interview scheduling
  • Careers page builder and website jobs widget
  • Employee onboarding and HR information system
  • Time off management and time tracking

G2 rating: 4.5/5 across 684 reviews.

Where they differ

Lever is the better recruiter tool. The CRM half of the platform makes it strong for proactive sourcing, candidate nurturing, and rediscovering talent in your database. Workable is the better generalist tool. It does ATS, sourcing, onboarding, and lightweight HRIS in one product, which is the right tradeoff for small teams that do not have a dedicated HR stack yet.

Lever strengths and weaknesses

Strengths:

  • Reviewers praise the intuitive interface.
  • Strong collaboration between recruiters, hiring managers, and interviewers.
  • ATS plus CRM in one platform reduces tool sprawl.

Weaknesses:

  • Advanced features come with a learning curve.
  • Reporting customization is limited.
  • Pricing is opaque and can feel expensive.

Workable strengths and weaknesses

Strengths:

  • Reviewers praise the intuitive interface and ease of use.
  • End-to-end recruiting plus lightweight HR in one platform.
  • Multi-board posting and resume handling are core strengths.

Weaknesses:

  • Limited customization for reports and templates.
  • Some users say Workable adds features that are not useful for their team.
  • Some Capterra reviews mention inconsistent customer service.

Lever vs Workable: feature breakdown

FeatureLeverWorkableTruffle (screening layer)
CategoryATS + CRMAll-in-one ATS + light HRCandidate screening (resume + video + assessments)
Founded2012 (San Francisco)2012 (London)2024
Best forMid-market teams that source proactivelySMBs needing integrated recruiting and lightweight HRTeams screening 50+ candidates per role
G2 rating4.3/5 (2,102 reviews)4.5/5 (684 reviews)New platform
Recruiting CRMYes (built in, core)Light (sourcing suite only)Not an ATS
HR / onboardingNoYes (light HRIS)No
One-way video interviewsVia integrationsVia integrationsYes (native)
Talent assessmentsVia integrationsVia integrationsYes (Personality, SJT, Environment Fit)
Truffle integrationNativeVia Zapier or API
Published pricingNo (contact sales)Yes ($299/month)Yes ($149/month)
Free trialNoYesYes (7 days, no credit card)

Key differentiator

Lever is a recruiter's tool. Workable is a small-team operator's tool. If a dedicated recruiter or recruiting team owns hiring, Lever is the better fit. If hiring is one of many things an HR generalist or office manager handles, Workable's all-in-one model wins.

Lever vs Workable: pricing

Lever pricing: contact sales. Mid-market and enterprise tiers. Reviewers describe pricing as expensive at scale.

Workable pricing: $299/month flat-rate (Starter tier) with a free trial. Higher tiers add features like advanced reporting and onboarding modules.

Truffle pricing: $149/month, or $99/month billed annually. No contracts, no per-seat pricing. 7-day free trial with no credit card required.

What you get for the price

Workable wins on price transparency. The $299/month starting tier includes the full ATS, sourcing suite, and HR basics. Lever is more expensive but more powerful for proactive recruiting.

Truffle is a complementary purchase, not a replacement. Pair $149/month Truffle with whichever ATS fits your team for the candidate-evaluation layer neither ATS does well.

Verdict

Lever and Workable suit different team shapes.

Pick Lever if you have a recruiter or recruiting team that sources proactively, nurtures passive candidates, and wants strong CRM features in the same tool as the ATS. Better fit for 200+ employee mid-market.

Pick Workable if you are SMB (under 200 employees), hiring is one of several things HR handles, and you want lightweight HRIS plus ATS in one platform with public pricing. The $299/month starting tier and free trial make evaluation easy.

Neither is a screening tool. Truffle adds resume scoring, one-way video interviews, and AI-resistant assessments on top of either ATS.

Why teams pick Truffle

Lever or Workable manages your candidates and your hiring workflow. Truffle helps you decide who to interview in the first place.

Truffle plugs into your ATS and adds:

  • Resume screening with rubric-based scoring against your position criteria, with reasoning attached.
  • One-way video interviews recorded on any device, with full transcripts, AI Match scores per response, and 30-second Candidate Shorts.
  • Talent assessments measuring personality (validated IPIP Big Five), situational judgment, and environment fit. AI-resistant by design.

Setup takes 10 minutes. Send candidates a Position Link. Sync stage updates back to Lever (native) or Workable (via Zapier or API). AI surfaces the evidence. You make the call.

$149/month. $99/month annual. 7-day free trial, no credit card.

Try Truffle free for 7 days

Frequently asked questions

Is Lever or Workable better for SMBs?

Workable is the better SMB pick. It publishes pricing starting at $299/month, offers a free trial, and bundles light HRIS features alongside the ATS for teams that do not have a dedicated HR stack. Lever is built for mid-market and is more expensive.

How much does Lever cost compared to Workable?

Workable starts at $299/month flat-rate with a free trial. Lever is contact-sales only. Public estimates put Lever at roughly $4,000 to $20,000+ per year depending on company size. For SMBs, Workable is typically the cheaper option.

Does Workable's built-in screening replace a tool like Truffle?

No. Workable's AI screening assistant ranks candidates by resume keywords. It does not run one-way video interviews with AI Match scoring, validated personality assessments, situational judgment tests, or generate Candidate Shorts. Truffle handles those layers and connects to Workable via Zapier or API.

What ATS does Truffle integrate with natively?

Truffle integrates natively with Greenhouse and Lever. Workable, iCIMS, and SmartRecruiters connect via Zapier or direct API. Native integrations sync candidate identity, interview link, stage updates, notes, tags, and AI Match scores automatically.

What are the G2 ratings for Lever and Workable?

Lever has a G2 rating of 4.3/5 across 2,102 reviews. Workable has a G2 rating of 4.5/5 across 684 reviews. Workable has the higher score; Lever has the larger review count.

Compare more tools

See how every screening tool stacks up.

Start typing to search 300+ pages on hiretruffle.com.