8 TestGorilla alternatives for small businesses in 2026

TestGorilla is the Kleenex of pre-employment assessment software: so ubiquitous that it’s got more people asking about it in Google than the entire category of talent assessment software.

TestGorilla has been the industry standard since it was founded in 2019, and its test library is still one of the deepest around. But two things haven’t changed since the last time you might have looked: there’s still no monthly plan on Core or Plus, and video interviews still live behind the higher tier. If you’re hiring a handful of roles a year, that combination is worth a second look before you sign anything.

So based on my experience using TestGorilla’s free trial, plus weeks researching and testing the latest alternatives, these are the 8 best alternatives to TestGorilla, along with what TestGorilla itself costs right now, verified directly against its pricing page.

How we evaluate and test recruiting software

Our reviews are written by recruiters and TA professionals who have spent years using, testing, and buying hiring tools. We evaluate every product against the same criteria: what it actually does, what it costs, how fast you can get value from it, and whether it solves the screening problems small teams face every day. Truffle is our product, and we are upfront about that. But we do not inflate competitor weaknesses or hide our own limitations. If a tool does something better, we say so. We think owners and small hiring teams deserve honest comparisons, not marketing disguised as editorial.

The 8 best TestGorilla alternatives in 2026

• Truffle for combining talent assessments, resumes, and one-way video interviews without an annual contract
• Wamly for straightforward video interviews
• Xobin for AI-powered skills testing with an ATS layer
• SparkHire for structured video plus an ATS
• Evalgator for transparent, per-candidate technical assessments
• Eddy for a general HR platform with a hiring add-on
• Monjin for AI-scheduled interviews run through a network of vetted interviewers
• VideoAsk for basic job application forms

What TestGorilla costs now, and why teams look elsewhere

Before you compare alternatives, it helps to know exactly what you’d be leaving. Here’s TestGorilla’s current plan structure, checked against its live pricing page:

• Free: $0/month. 10 credits a month, 5 essential skills tests, resume scoring, qualifying questions, and 1 full-access seat.
• Core: $142/month, billed annually ($1,704/year). Full library of 350+ tests, video questions from TestGorilla’s own library, resume scoring, sourcing access to a pool of 2 million-plus pre-tested candidates, and 2 full-access seats.
• Plus: from $400/month, billed annually (from $4,800/year). Everything in Core, plus AI interviews with full customization and auto-scoring, job simulations, custom tests and coding challenges, ID verification, ATS integrations and API access, and unlimited seats.
• Enterprise: custom pricing, with scientific validation and security and compliance reviews layered on top of Plus.

Credits are spent per candidate: 1 credit for a skills test, a video question, or ID verification, and 2 credits for an AI interview or job simulation. Resume scoring and qualifying questions don’t cost anything, and TestGorilla only charges a credit once a candidate actually starts the assessment.

Two specifics catch small teams off guard. First, there’s no monthly option on Core or Plus. If you’re hiring one or two roles a year, you’re paying $1,704 whether you run 5 assessments or 500. Second, one-way and conversational video interviews sit on the Plus tier, not Core, so a team that wants both assessments and video ends up running two tools, or paying the $400/month rate just to unlock video.

That shows up in the reviews. TestGorilla holds roughly 4.5 out of 5 across around 1,400 reviews on G2, but drops to 3.9 out of 5 across more than 1,700 reviews on Trustpilot, where pricing and cancellation policy are the most common complaints. TestGorilla’s own proctoring suite (webcam snapshots, full-screen and tab-switch monitoring, disabled copy-paste, and IP and location logging) is genuinely thorough, which matters if you’re running standardized exams, but it’s also built for a locked-down testing environment rather than a conversational first read on a candidate.

None of that makes TestGorilla a bad product. For a company running assessments across dozens of roles a year, the annual math can pencil out, and the test library is deep enough to cover almost any technical or cognitive skill you’d want to check. It’s a different story if you’re an owner hiring the same three or four roles on repeat and don’t want a year-long contract sized for a testing program you don’t run.

Truffle vs TestGorilla: what actually changes when you switch

If TestGorilla is on your shortlist because it’s the name you already know, here’s the actual side-by-side, not the marketing version.

The contract is the biggest gap

TestGorilla’s Core and Plus plans both require paying for a year up front, before you’ve run a single role through them. Truffle’s Starter plan is $49 a month with no annual contract, so you can test the fit on one open role before committing to anything longer. If Truffle doesn’t work for your hiring pattern, you cancel. If TestGorilla doesn’t, you’ve already paid for the year.

One workflow instead of two logins

TestGorilla’s assessments and its video interviews aren’t the same product tier. Assessments run on Core; conversational and one-way video sit on Plus. A team that wants both usually ends up running assessments in TestGorilla and one-way video interviews in a second tool, which means two logins and two separate experiences for a candidate applying to a single role.

Truffle puts resume screening, one-way interviews, and assessments behind one shared link, with everything rolling into a single ranked shortlist. That’s the same problem we’ve seen play out with standalone assessment platforms generally: the score is only useful if it lands next to the rest of what you know about the candidate, not in a report you have to go dig up separately.

A shorter ask before the first real conversation

TestGorilla’s own guidance keeps individual tests to about 10 minutes each to avoid fatigue, but a combined assessment pulled from its 350+ test library commonly runs 60 to 90 minutes for the candidate. That’s a long sit before anyone from your company has said a word to them. Truffle’s pre-employment assessments run as three fixed tests (Personality, Situational Judgment, and Environment Fit) alongside a short one-way interview and a resume review, all inside one flow, so candidates see one experience instead of a stack of modules assembled from a library.

Different answers to “how do I know they didn’t cheat”

TestGorilla leans on proctoring: webcam snapshots, tab-switch detection, and location logging, built for a locked-down exam. Truffle’s AI Check flags patterns that suggest a response may have been AI-assisted and surfaces that as context you can raise in a follow-up question, not a verdict that disqualifies anyone. If your screening is mostly standardized skills and coding tests where a proctored environment matters, TestGorilla’s approach is the more purpose-built one. If you’re screening a flood of resumes for a front-desk or coordinator role, a locked-down exam is more infrastructure than the situation calls for.

What TestGorilla still does better

Its 350+ test library, spanning cognitive, programming, role-specific, language, and software-skills categories, is broader than anything Truffle offers. If deep, standardized technical testing is the actual bottleneck, that library is a real reason to stay.

What makes the best TestGorilla alternative?

TestGorilla is primarily a pre-employment testing platform built to help hiring teams assess candidates before the interview stage. But the best TestGorilla alternatives on this list don’t all take the same approach. Some lean more heavily into technical testing, while others combine assessments with resume screening, one-way video interviews, and other features.

Like many other categories of hiring software, AI features are becoming standard here too. This list doesn’t only focus on AI recruiting software, but AI can absolutely shape how useful a platform feels in practice. The best tools do more than automate scoring. They help you review candidates faster, surface stronger signals, and make more consistent decisions without adding complexity.

Based on that, here’s what the best TestGorilla alternative should offer:

• Role-relevant assessments. A large test library helps, but breadth isn’t the same as fit. The best talent assessment software makes it easy to assess the skills, judgment, and qualifications that actually matter for the role, not everything that’s in the catalog.
• A strong candidate experience. Some assessment platforms feel long, impersonal, or overly rigid. The best alternatives keep screening short and respectful of the candidate’s time, which shows up directly in completion rates.
• More than just a score. A raw test result only tells you so much. The strongest platforms add context through summaries, rankings, transcripts, or additional screening layers, so it’s easier to decide who deserves a closer look, without you having to go find the score in a separate report.
• Flexible screening options. Not every role should be evaluated the same way. The best alternatives let you combine formats (skills tests, one-way video, resumes, knockout questions) instead of forcing every process into one template.
• Ease of use. Small hiring teams don’t need more admin. The best alternatives are simple to set up and easy to share with anyone else helping you hire.
• Anti-cheating that fits the stakes. A full proctoring suite makes sense for a standardized exam. For a first-round screen, a lighter transparency signal that flags a pattern without disqualifying anyone is often the better trade.
• Pricing and a contract length that match how often you actually hire. TestGorilla isn’t always the right fit, especially if you’re paying an annual rate for features you use twice a year. The best alternative gives you the screening depth you need without locking you into a contract sized for volume you don’t have.

The right choice depends on what part of screening you’re trying to improve, and how often you’re actually hiring. Some teams want deeper assessments. Others want a more flexible workflow or a way to pay only for the months they’re posting roles.

The best TestGorilla alternatives at a glance

Platform	Best for	Interview type	Assessments	Pricing
TestGorilla (for reference)	Deep technical test libraries at volume	AI video (Plus and up)	Yes: 350+ test library	Free plan, then $142/mo (Core) or from $400/mo (Plus), billed annually only
Truffle	Screening every candidate without phone-screening all of them	One-way video + audio	Yes: Personality, Situational Judgment, Environment Fit	From $49/mo, credit-based, no annual lock-in. 7-day free trial
Wamly	SMBs that want async video at scale	One-way video	Yes, tier-dependent	Priced per seat tier (up to 50, 500, or 5,000 users), quote-based
Xobin	Skills testing plus interviews with an ATS layer	AI-led video + coding	Yes: skills, psychometric, coding	Usage-based, custom quote, not publicly listed
Spark Hire	Structured video interviewing plus an ATS	One-way + live video	Yes: predictive behavioral, Growth plan and up	From $249/mo billed annually for video interviews ($299/mo month-to-month, capped at 5 jobs and 5 users); Recruit ATS from $335/mo
Evalgator	Proctored technical assessments	Video + coding tests	Yes: technical and non-technical libraries	Per-candidate credits, roughly ₹180 ($2) per assessment and ₹100 ($1.15) per coding interview. 15-day free trial
Monjin	Real-time video interviews through a vetted interviewer network	Live video, AI-powered scheduling	No structured assessment library	Custom quote only, no published pricing
Eddy	All-in-one HR for small US businesses	ATS only, no video	No	Starter from $4/employee/mo plus a $50/mo base fee; hiring add-on is a separate $199/mo
VideoAsk	Casual async video collection	Async video responses	No	Free plan available; Grow from $24/mo, Brand from $40/mo, metered by minutes processed

Best for screening every candidate without phone-screening all of them

Truffle

Let’s not bury the lede: Truffle is a candidate screening platform that combines one-way video interviews, talent assessments, and resume screening. Use any on its own or combine them as needed. Built for owners, GMs, and small agency recruiters who screen every candidate without phone-screening all of them, Truffle helps you build ranked shortlists fast without sacrificing hiring quality. Assessments measure what AI can’t fake: personality tendencies, situational judgment, and work environment preferences.

Candidates complete screening questions and assessments on any device at their convenience. Truffle’s AI then surfaces summaries, match scores, and diagnostic insights for every candidate, so you can quickly build ranked shortlists and decide who’s worth a conversation. AI handles what’s tedious. You handle what’s human.

Why teams switch to Truffle:

• One-way interviews let you screen every candidate without spending your week on phone calls, on the entry plan, not gated behind a higher tier
• AI-resistant assessments measure what AI can’t fake: personality, judgment, environment fit, without the 60-90 minute combined test time a full library assembly can run
• AI summaries and match scores surface who’s worth talking to in minutes, not hours
• Candidate Shorts give you 30-second video snapshots of every candidate
• Plans start at $49/month with no annual commitment required, credits roll over instead of resetting, and a 7-day free trial gives you 30 credits with no card

What to consider:

• Three structured assessments (Personality, Situational Judgment, Environment Fit) built into every screening flow, rather than a library you assemble yourself. If deep technical or coding skills testing across dozens of roles is your priority, TestGorilla’s 350+ test library is still broader on that specific dimension
• AI Check flags patterns that suggest AI assistance as a context signal, not a locked-down proctoring environment. If your screening genuinely needs webcam monitoring and tab-switch detection for a formal exam, that’s TestGorilla’s or Evalgator’s territory, not Truffle’s

Ratings

• Highly rated on G2 and Capterra

Pricing

• From $49/month, credit-based, unlimited users, no annual lock-in required. 7-day free trial, 30 credits, no credit card required

If you’re exhausted by high candidate volume and limited screening time, Truffle helps you screen every candidate without phone-screening all of them, while preserving the human judgment that matters.

Best for SMBs that want async video at scale

Wamly

Wamly offers a straightforward video screening platform with multiple question types, candidate filters, and custom branding. It’s a favorite among South African businesses and growing internationally.

Key features:

• Async interviews with custom time limits
• Notes, tagging, and ratings for collaborative review
• Smart filtering and reminders

What’s missing:

• No published pricing on any of its three seat tiers (up to 50, 500, or 5,000 users), so you can’t compare cost against tools that list rates without contacting sales first
• No talent assessments of its own, so pairing it with a separate testing tool means the same two-login problem TestGorilla has between its assessment and video tiers

Pricing

• Priced by seat tier (up to 50, up to 500, or up to 5,000 users), with prepaid or postpaid billing. Contact Wamly for a quote, since exact rates aren’t published

Best for AI-powered skills testing with end-to-end hiring automation

Xobin

Xobin is an AI-powered pre-employment assessment platform that goes beyond a single test type. It combines skills assessments, psychometric and personality testing, coding challenges, AI-led video interviews, and remote proctoring in one system, with an ATS layer (Tracks) so you can manage the full pipeline without stitching separate tools together.

With 3,400+ skill-based assessments and 2,500+ job-role tests, Xobin leans toward teams hiring at scale across multiple functions and geographies. That breadth is more than a small team hiring a few roles a year will use, but it fits if you’re running assessments across many roles at once.

Features to note:

• Psychometric and personality assessments alongside technical and coding tests, useful for roles where soft-skill fit matters as much as hard skills
• AI-led interviews that auto-score responses and flag standout candidates
• Built-in proctoring and integrity checks for high-stakes or remote hiring
• Optional ATS (Tracks) to move from assessment to shortlist without exporting data elsewhere

What to consider:

• No published pricing at all, usage-based and quote-only, so you can’t size the cost of a single role before a sales conversation
• Broader platform than pure video-screening tools, so setup involves more configuration if you only need one test type

Ratings

• 4.8/5 on G2, used by 5,000+ hiring teams worldwide

Pricing

• Usage-based, contact Xobin for a custom quote

Best for structured video interviewing plus an ATS

SparkHire

SparkHire has been in the video interviewing game longer than most. With features like live interviews, team commenting, candidate tagging, and a full applicant tracking system, it’s well-suited to teams that want video screening built into a broader hiring workflow.

Top features:

• One-way and live video options
• Strong collaboration tools for multi-stakeholder hiring
• Full Recruit ATS available as a bundled option, with AI resume review

Watch-outs:

• The month-to-month video plan runs $299/month and caps you at 5 jobs and 5 users. Annual billing drops that to $249/month with unlimited jobs and users, the same annual-commitment trade-off TestGorilla makes you choose
• No talent assessments built in beyond a predictive behavioral test on the Growth ATS plan and up, so pairing SparkHire with proper skills testing means a third tool

Pricing

• Video interviews start from $249/month billed annually (or $299/month month-to-month, capped at 5 jobs and 5 users). The Recruit ATS plan starts at $335/month for companies up to 200 employees

Best for transparent, per-candidate technical assessments

Evalgator

Evalgator blends coding tests, video interview questions, and integrity checks into one platform. You can create role-specific assessments with remote proctoring and anti-cheat measures for peace of mind, and unlike some assessment tools, the pricing is actually published.

Features to note:

• Anti-cheating measures from the Pro tier up, with automatic face verification as an Enterprise-only add-on
• Technical and non-technical test libraries
• Collaborative coding environments
• Per-candidate credit pricing instead of a flat monthly rate

Downsides:

• Pipeline tracking is Enterprise-only, so a small team paying per candidate still doesn’t get shortlist management without upgrading
• Better suited to engineering-heavy hiring than general roles like front-desk, admin, or sales, where Evalgator’s technical test libraries are less relevant

Pricing

• Assessments run roughly ₹180 per candidate (about $2) and coding interviews roughly ₹100 per candidate (about $1.15), billed per credit. A 15-day free trial includes 15 credits with no card required

Best for an AI-scheduled interviewer network

Monjin

Monjin positions itself as an interviewer’s network: real-time video interviews scheduled with AI and run through a pool of vetted third-party interviewers, rather than a self-serve test or interview builder you configure yourself.

What’s unique:

• Interviews are conducted by Monjin’s own network of vetted interviewers, not just recorded and self-scored
• AI-powered scheduling handles the back-and-forth of booking a live conversation
• Built around live, interviewer-led sessions rather than a one-way recorded format

Considerations:

• No structured skills or personality assessment library. If you want a test score alongside the interview, you’re pairing this with a separate assessment tool
• Pricing isn’t public. Custom quotes only, so it’s hard to compare cost against tools that list rates, and a quote-only model generally isn’t built for a single-role, self-serve buyer

Best for all-in-one HR needs

Eddy

If you’re a small US business that wants hiring, onboarding, and payroll in one place, Eddy can do it all. It’s less a pure screening tool and more a lightweight HR suite with solid applicant tracking, and its hiring features are sold separately from its core HR plans.

Notable features:

• Job board posting and applicant tracking (hiring add-on)
• Payroll and time tracking (separate add-ons)
• Easy onboarding for new hires

But:

• No video interviews or talent assessments of any kind, so screening still happens by reading applications manually
• Core HR starts at $4/employee/month plus a $50/month base fee, and the hiring add-on is a separate $199/month, so your real monthly cost for screening plus HR is higher than the base rate suggests
• Limited to US-based employers

Pricing

• Core HR starts at $4/employee/month plus a $50/month base fee. The hiring add-on, which covers job posting and applicant tracking, is a separate $199/month

Best for casual async interviews

VideoAsk

VideoAsk is technically a Typeform product but it’s been adopted by recruiters for quick-hit video screening. It’s not a hiring platform per se, but if you’re looking for a lightweight way to collect video responses, it’s an easy plug-in.

Best for:

• Startups and creative agencies
• Field recruiting or mobile-first workflows

Missing pieces:

• No built-in analytics, ATS, or scoring feature of any kind, so ranking candidates still happens by hand
• Paid plans are metered by minutes of video and audio processed per month (Grow at $24/mo covers 100 minutes, Brand at $40/mo covers 200), not by candidate volume, so cost can climb fast on a high-volume role

Which TestGorilla alternative should you choose?

The right TestGorilla alternative depends on what you need most from your screening software, and how your hiring volume actually looks over a year. Do you want a deeper assessment library and enough volume to justify an annual contract? Do you need one-way video interviews without committing to twelve months upfront? Or do you want a broader hiring platform that covers screening, collaboration, and HR workflows in one place?

Most of the tools on this list offer a demo, trial, or free tier so you can test the product before you commit. Run a live role through two or three options, see what the candidate experience feels like, and pay close attention to the billing terms, not just the sticker price. The best platform is usually the one that helps you reach a decision faster without locking you into a contract sized for a hiring volume you don’t have.

There are plenty of other assessment tools out there that didn’t make this list. But for specific use cases, these are the ones I’d point you to first:

• Truffle if you want to combine assessments, resumes, and one-way video interviews without an annual contract
• Wamly if you want a straightforward async video interview tool
• Xobin if you want AI-powered skills testing and psychometric assessments with interviews and an ATS in one platform
• Spark Hire if you want video interviews bundled with a full ATS
• Evalgator if you’re focused on proctored technical assessments and want transparent per-candidate pricing
• Monjin if you’d rather hand off live interviews to a vetted interviewer network than build your own screening flow
• Eddy if you want hiring software that also covers onboarding and payroll
• VideoAsk if you just need a lightweight way to collect video responses

TestGorilla helped popularize pre-employment testing for a lot of teams, and its test library is still one of the deepest around. But if you’re hiring a handful of roles a year and don’t want to sign a 12-month contract to get there, the category has moved on. The best alternatives now do more than deliver a test score. They help you collect better signals, review candidates more efficiently, and move from candidate pile to shortlist with less friction and less commitment.

Choose the tool that fits the way you actually hire, including how often. That matters more than picking the platform with the biggest test catalog or the longest feature list.

FAQs about TestGorilla alternatives

Does TestGorilla have a monthly plan?

No. As of this update, TestGorilla’s paid Core and Plus plans are billed annually only, with no month-to-month option. The Free plan is the one exception, at $0/month with 10 credits.

Is TestGorilla worth it for a small business hiring a few roles a year?

It depends on your volume. Core costs $1,704 for the year regardless of how many assessments you actually run, so if you’re filling one or two roles annually, you’re paying for capacity you won’t use. If you hire on repeat throughout the year, the math looks different.

What does TestGorilla’s free plan include?

The Free plan gives you 10 credits a month, 5 essential skills tests, resume scoring, qualifying questions, 5 preset custom questions, and 1 full-access seat. It’s a reasonable way to test the product before deciding whether the annual commitment makes sense.

Which TestGorilla alternative is cheapest for occasional hiring?

Truffle’s Starter plan starts at $49/month with no annual lock-in, and credits roll over instead of expiring at the end of the month. For proctored technical testing specifically, Evalgator’s per-candidate pricing (roughly $1-2 a candidate) means you only pay for what you use.

Do TestGorilla alternatives include one-way video interviews?

Most of the tools on this list do, though the depth varies. Truffle, Wamly, Xobin, Spark Hire, Evalgator, and Monjin all include some form of video screening. Eddy and VideoAsk are the exceptions: Eddy skips video for a broader HR toolkit, and VideoAsk is a lightweight video collection tool without scoring or an ATS.

Does TestGorilla have anti-cheating tools?

Yes, and its proctoring suite is genuinely thorough: webcam snapshots, full-screen and tab-switch monitoring, disabled copy-paste, and IP and location logging. That’s built for a formal exam environment. If you want that level of lockdown, TestGorilla or Evalgator are the stronger fits on this list. If a lighter context signal is enough for a first-round screen, Truffle’s AI Check flags patterns without the full proctoring setup.

If you want to see the full head-to-head, including exactly how the assessment library and screening workflow compare, our pre-employment assessment software page walks through how Truffle’s resume, interview, and assessment layers fit together, and you can start a 7-day free trial with 30 credits and no card to try it against a real open role.

This article was originally published in April 2025 by Sean Griffith. The most recent update was in August 2026, with pricing and ratings reverified directly against TestGorilla’s live pricing page and current review data.